Quantcast
Channel: We left at the interval...
Viewing all 355 articles
Browse latest View live

Reimann - Lear

$
0
0
ONP Garnier, Monday June 6 2016

Conductor: Fabio Luisi. Production: Calixto Bieito. Sets: Rebecca Ringst. Costumes: Ingo Krügler. Video: Sarah Derendinger. Lighting: Franck Evin. König Lear: Bo Skovhus. König von Frankreich: Gidon Saks. Herzog von Albany: Andreas Scheibner. Herzog von Cornwall: Michael Colvin. Graf von Kent: Kor-Jan Dusseljee. Graf von Gloster: Lauri Vasar. Edgar: Andrew Watts. Edmund: Andreas Conrad. Goneril: Ricarda Merbeth. Regan: Erika Sunnegardh. Cordelia: Annette Dasch. Narr: Ernst Alisch. Bedienter: Nicolas Marie. Ritter: Lucas Prisor. Orchestra and chorus of the Opéra National de Paris. 

Reimann
"Tout y était. Il n'y a rien à dire." So said my neighbour at the end, and he was right. What can you add when, for once, everything is at such a fervent pitch, with singing, acting and playing consistently, even triumphantly (if such a word can be used in the gruesome context of King Lear) meeting the enormous demands of an uncompromising score in an uncompromising production. I will put in a special word for the energy, commitment and generosity of Ricarda Merbeth and Bo Skovhus, here more impressive by far than I ever saw and heard them before, and for the phenomenal performance of Andrew Watts in a role seemingly calling for both baritone and countertenor voices in one. But this wasn't the kind of performance where you really want or need to single one singer out: the cast was, frankly, amazing and, after the traditional vaguely-chaotic start, the orchestra warmed up to its absolute best, playing up a storm - literally, of course, when called for, and to thunderous effect.

Calixto Bieito's production was simple, uncompromising, as I said and as you might expect, hugely demanding of the singers' acting skills and hugely successful in bringing them out: a directing tour de force, though in a fairly simple, single construction. The stage and proscenium were clad with black boards, as if tarred or charred, and during the opening scenes a kind of "curtain" of similarly charred or tarry-looking planks hung vertically across the stage. The lighting, mostly starkly white, softened with dry-ice haze, verged on expressionistic: searchlight-like spots criss-crossing downwards and beams cast between the planks by pinpoint backlights (that annoyed one member of the audience, who voiced his complaint about them loudly at the end of the first half). The contemporary costumes were, until grubbied or removed in the course of the play (Lear, for example, spent most of the second half in filthy boxers), the kind of dull, expensive clothes worn today by northern Europe's royal families. Goneril, Regan and courtiers scrabbled on the floor for bread broken off and thrown down by Lear.

When we moved to the woods, the vertical planks were partially lowered, some leaning forwards, others backwards, on their wires, making a giant thicket. In the second half, the piercing backlights were replaced by slow-moving, enigmatic projections in shades of grey. We could make out, at the rear through the chaos of planks, a very slow pan along a very old, possibly dead, body. Other images were less legible: densely wrinkled skin? An eye or some other viscously glossy, organic, living thing, very close up? As the action advanced and utter madness seemed gradually to grip everyone on stage, the planks continued to fall until they lay, parallel but uneven in height, on the stage, still attached to their wires. At the end, surrounded by death, Lear sat alone in his boxers with his legs dangling into the pit, head askew, mouth open, and the lights went out.

In such a harrowing staging, the "Pieta" references: Cordelia cradling Lear, then, later, vice-versa, seemed a touch corny to me (though not at all to my neighbour, who was impressed), in what was otherwise a near-perfect production: a monumental success. A magnificent end to the Paris Opera season - even more magnificent than the start, with Moses und Aron. I hope these can be taken as promising signs of what's to come (under Lissner, I mean). Chronic opera-going often, you may have heard me say, comes to seem a thankless obsession. When there's so much to get right, unsurprisingly a lot can and, as well all know, does go wrong. You even, sometimes, leave at the interval. But occasionally, along comes the kind of evening that reminds you why you keep going back. It makes up for the rest and reconciles you to your expensive hobby. This was one.

Rossini - L'Italiana in Algeri

$
0
0
Théâtre des Champs Elysées, Paris, Friday June 10 2016

Conductor : Jean-Claude Malgoire. Production and sets : Christian Schiaretti. Costumes: Thibaut Welchlin. Lighting: Julia Grand. Isabella: Anna Reinhold. Lindoro: Artavazd Sargsyan. Taddeo: Domenico Balzani. Mustapha: Sergio Gallardo. Elvira : Samantha Louis-Jean. Haly : Renaud Delaigue. Zulma. La Grande Ecurie et la Chambre du Roy. Ensemble Vocal de l’Atelier Lyrique de Tourcoing.

Rossini
There’s something seriously wrong when the best-cast parts in L’Italiana in Algeri are Taddeo and Zulma. My neighbour thought it was “criminal” to push these gauche young singers on to the stage of the TCE in parts so far beyond their means. The audience was indulgent, but by the end of “Languir per una bella” there was already a hint of booing from high up on the left. I will say no more about the singing.

Jean-Claude Malgoire was something of a pioneer of the baroque revival in France, and this production was, if I understood correctly, intended to celebrate 50 years of his efforts. He started out back in the days when baroque ensembles were ragged and out of tune, and hasn’t changed a bit since. His orchestra sounded like a village band on a bad afternoon. The horn obbligato was a mess and in rapid passages even the upper strings became a barely audible blur. The bass drum thumped away with abandon, drowning out the poor soloists.

Malgoire has always had a singular gift for making even the most sparkling work boring: there wasn’t a single clap of applause after the overture, and as usual the tempi throughout what I stayed for were, with only the rare exception, plodding. No wonder, with the rise of the likes of Les Arts Florissants, Les Musiciens du Louvre and Les Talens Lyriques, La Grande Ecurie has faded into near-oblivion in its northern backwater.

The only redeeming features of this production were the sets, lighting and costumes. The sets in particular were simple and effective: three layers of gauze, overprinted with old engravings of an oriental city with domes and minarets, and of Moorish arches, atmospherically lit in various colours. There were carpets on the floor and rows of lanterns above. It looked at first as if we'd be spared the school-production awfulness that sometimes tempts directors in these works, but soon the familair bags of pasta appeared and the silly dances started... There was little sign of directing skill: the younger soloists were awkward on stage, not knowing how either to move or stand still, or what to do with their hands.

A proper director with a better cast and Minkowski and his band in the pit could have made good use of the sets, but in the present circumstances, boredom, as my neighbour noted, had set in even before the overture was over. We left at the interval.

VPO/Nott/Kaufmann: Beethoven, Strauss, Mahler

$
0
0
Théâtre des Champs Elysées, Paris, Thursday June 23 2016

Conductor: Jonathan Nott. Jonas Kaufmann. Wiener Philharmoniker.

  • Beethoven: Overture Coriolan
  • Strauss: Tod und Verklärung
  • Mahler: Das Lied von der Erde

Not Jonas Kaufmann
I really must learn to pay more attention, when I get my season’s tickets from the TCE, to where they’ve put me. It was only when I arrived there last night that I realised I was on the front row, which in my opinion shouldn’t be sold as top category at all as there’s no hope, with your nose up the violin section’s trouser legs, of hearing properly balanced sound. For the sake of completeness, I’ll write up my thoughts, but whether they resemble anyone else’s experience will be anyone’s guess.

So I’ll be brief.



  1. The Coriolan overture, as played by the Wiener Phil., simply reminded me that these days I prefer to hear Beethoven played by smaller, “hipper” orchestras. It was at once massive and humdrum.
  2. It was about 30 minutes into the concert, as we at last plunged into a proper Straussian maelstrom, that things seemed to pick up, i.e. the orchestra started to sound like it was doing what it should by rights be doing. However, Jonathan Nott’s performance had neither the mystery nor the violence you might expect in Tod und V. and, though I don’t think I dozed off, I actually missed the moment of death. The Wiener Phil. Is capable of quieter playing than Nott seemed inclined to demand and anything less than mezzo-forte was a rarity.
  3. In the songs, there was at last true pianissimo playing when required, which I assumed to be in response to Kaufmann’s virtuoso performance: what the French call a “leçon de chant” – a lesson in singing, a wonderful display of technical mastery: dynamic range, variety of vocal colour, faultless tuning, daring breathing, delicacy of sentiment… His bright, ringing top notes, from the outset, and intimate, speech-like pianissimi (reminding me of Anna Caterina Antonacci) were both truly impressive. But the decision to sing all six songs meant Kaufmann’s lack of projection at the bottom was made evident – and I admit I missed a mezzo, however wonderful were his murmured “Ewig…” at the end. Wonderful to me, at least: I see on the web today that people are complaining he was sometimes inaudible from the upper balconies, partly because of his own interpretative choices and partly because of Nott’s nuance-lite conducting, straightforward to the point of insensitivity. At the end, I had the feeling Nott wasn’t quite up to the orchestra and soloist he found himself blessed with (replacing Daniele Gatti, off with a shoulder sprain).
Maestro Wenarto attacks "Von der Schönheit".

    Sondheim - Sweeney Todd

    $
    0
    0
    Palais de la Monnaie, Brussels, Sunday June 26 2016

    Conductor: Bassem Akiki. Production: James Brining. Sets & costumes: Colin Richmond. Lighting: Chris Davey. Sweeney Todd: Scott Hendricks. Anthony Hope: Finnur Bjarnason. Beggar Woman: Natascha Petrinsky. Mrs. Lovett: Carole Wilson. Judge Turpin: Andrew Schroeder. Beadle Bamford: Christopher Gillett. Johanna Barker: Hendrickje Van Kerckhove. Tobias Ragg: George Ure. Pirelli: Paul Charles Clarke. Jonas Fogg: Matthew Zadow. Orchestra and Chorus of La Monnaie.

    From La Monnaie's web-site:

    'The production of Frankenstein - the new creation that La Monnaie commissioned from the American composer Mark Grey, based on an idea by Alex Ollé of La Fura dels Baus - is postponed to a later date. Instead of Frankenstein, we will close this season with another first for La Monnaie, which is also “out of the box”: namely Sweeney Todd.'

    The Châtelet in Paris has been putting on Sondheim pieces for the past three of four years, but, having heard bits on the radio or web, I have steered clear. The Brussels matinée subscription is, however, a set menu: you take what you are given (though in this case not what was originally announced). So along we went.

    Not entirely "out-of-the box", as the economical but effective sets used shipping containers: on the right, a couple of them, stacked, on the left, another, raised on scaffolding, between them an opening with an industrial curtain of vertical plastic strips. The boxes opened up to show rooms in Turpin's house or, on the left, the barber shop. The production was in that vaguely modern dress – not 50s, not 60s, not quite today either – we see so often. The acting, it seemed to me, was stage-school style – borderline hammy, trying hard but not quite succeeding. The dialogues and singing were all miked, so it was impossible to see who was saying or singing what, or judge of the performance. The text sounded like A. C. Douglas struggling to be humorous, and fake Cockney accents only made it worse. And, finally, the music confirmed what I suspected: I can't bear Sondheim. It's nails on slate to my ears ("Send in the clowns": aaaaaargh....). I know I'm in a minority, but I'm not alone: after mentioning it to a friend on Gmail, I received this:

    "I LOATHE Sondheim. I presume you have seen this ('Waiting for the tune to begin...')"


    So as soon as we could escape the stifling, noisy tent La Monnaie is currently using (and risks using for the whole 2016-2017 season), we did.

    Leoncavallo - I Pagliacci

    $
    0
    0
    Apollo(n) Theatre, Ermoupoli, Syros, Friday July 15 2016

    Conductor: Giovanni Pacor. Production: Detlef Soelter. Canio: Piero Giuliacci. Nedda: Eilana Lappalainen. Tonio: Massimiliano Fichera. Beppe: Ioannis Kavouras. Silvio: Joseph Lim. Pan-European Philharmonia. Greek Opera Studio. Ile de France children’s chorus.

    Leoncavallo
    In the middle of the 19th century, Ermoupoli, capital of Syros in the Cyclades, was a thriving shipbuilding and trading town and a more important port than Piraeus, rich enough to build a small Italian-style, horseshoe-shaped opera house. The Apollo (sometimes Apollon) Theatre was renovated at the turn of the present century, and I found myself invited to Syros for my birthday and to I Pagliacci there the next day.

    It was a far better experience than anyone might have feared, a more-than-just-creditable performance, and quite a lot of fun. It was also an appreciable chance to get some idea of what opera in small and relatively remote houses was like back then. The intimacy with the singers (especially when the production, as here, invades the auditorium) makes it a very different experience from opera in gigantic places like the Met or the Bastille, and means soloists with voices that might not survive in New York or Paris can be cast with some success in Syros.

    Though I suppose it isn’t logical, I know I’m inclined to be more indulgent and easily-pleased with small companies making the effort to stage operas in cash-strapped venues. My host evidently isn’t, complaining that the small stage was unnecessarily cluttered and that Bob Wilson (no less) would have done a better job by leaving more to the imagination. He was right, though, that the little stage-within-a-stage with its strings of light-bulbs and clown backdrop would have been enough; Nedda’s caravan, on the left, and the painted Italian village square all round, could have been dispensed with and would have left more room for the lively action.

    It was a modern-dress production – among other things, no doubt saving money on costumes, though Canio had the apropriate baggy check clown pants and a trailing tailcoat in patches of black and grey and Nedda, once got up as Colombina, was in a red-spotted dress with yellow pigtails and exaggerated makeup. The Prologue was sung in the centre aisle and the chorus started out in the tiered stage-side boxes, waving flags (including the Finnish one, as the ambassador was, it was announced formally by someone from the Town Hall, present) and eventually entered through the house. The acting was sometimes, no doubt deliberately, melodramatic and the chorus movements were no worse (including the kids) than anywhere else in such cramped surroundings.

    Massimiliano Fichera was both solid and enthusiastic and Joseph Lim was, if staid (not that there’s much you can do with Silvio), solid too: a pair of sound, well-trained young voices. Piero Giuliacci was a much better Canio than you might have anticipated in the circumstances. And the orchestra was perfectly competent and was even equipped with a proper set of tubular bells. Only Eilana Lappalainen was over the top (no, I didn’t say over the hill…): her voice was loud and squally, making Nedda’s awful bird aria even more chaotic than usual, and she’s a bit mature to be prancing round like a teenage ingénue in yellow pigtails, though she undeniably threw herself into it with near abandon. That didn’t, however, ruin the evening. I enjoyed my birthday treat.

    Wenarto stages the tragic finale here.

    Staatskapelle Berlin under Barenboim: Mozart and Bruckner

    $
    0
    0
    La Philharmonie, Paris, Thursday September 8 2016

    Conductor and piano soloist: Daniel Barenboim. Staatskapelle Berlin.
    • Mozart, piano concerto n°26
    • Bruckner, symphony n°6
    I know nothing about acoustics and will only try to describe what I thought I heard from my single seat the other night. But scouting round the web for better-informed opinions about Paris's Philharmonie, I came a cross a blog called From The Sound Up, by an acoustical and architectural designer working in New York, and an article there entitled Why I can’t review the Philharmonie de Paris but why it’s worth trying anyway: a meditation on variability, which gives the impression that the sound in the new hall is especially varied. “Variation in the sound field is the topic of this post,” he writes, “because it is all I could think about after my experience in the brand-new (or, more accurately, yet-to-be-finished) Philharmonie de Paris. During a single concert, I experienced what might have been the worst concert hall acoustics of the tour, followed by what might have been the best.”

    I was in a category 2 seat and found myself on the steeply-raked 5th-floor balcony that faces the orchestra, which a friend calls the "wall of death". For the category (and price: 90 euros) this was surprisingly far from the square, central platform. With reverberation I've seen put variously at 2.3 and 2.6 seconds, the overall sound was, to me, "churchy" (my neighbour said "swimming pool" but I'd say that was an exaggeration; at the end of the concert he claimed they should pull the place down and start again from scratch).

    On account of the distance, it was as if I were sitting somewhere in the nave and the orchestra were playing in font of the altar. The overall sound is warm and roundish and to some extent enveloping, and during quiet passages it's certainly nicely detailed, but when the "high" instruments - the flutes and above all the violins - play loudly, the reverberation kicks in to give a soupy sort of "Mantovani" effect, obscuring the detail. I think this is what some people mean when they say that there is a "halo" around the sound. Lower instruments, cellos and basses especially, fare much, much better.

    The other issue, again at least from where I sat, was that when a score goes abruptly from very loud to very soft, which happens quite often in Bruckner, for the duration of the echo there's confusion, obscuring what follows.

    Overall, I would prefer a drier sound. To my ear, that reverb. too often blurs details, and after an hour or so, because of the excess distance, I started to feel out of things and switch off. One day I will have to go back and sit nearer, to see if the effect is more inclusive – but as I said above, it looks, from what I've read here and there, as if it will be very hard to decide where exactly to buy a seat, the implication being not that sections of the hall are different, but that each individual seat – and even your position sitting in it – is!

    A detail: by one of those odd quirks of acoustics, during the concerto, the sound of the piano hammers was distinctly audible, tap-tap-tapping like a disembodied woodpecker, about three rows in front of me, to the left.

    Bruckner
    The programme was oddly lop-sided: a 25-minute concerto followed by a 20-minute interval, and then the symphony. Why orchestras no longer play overtures baffles me. Will we never hear them again?

    The concerto was Mozart exactly as I no longer want to hear him, by a sleek modern orchestra and on a gleaming piano the size of a ship with plummy sound and a dynamic range Mozart never heard. Barenboim certainly exploited the dynamic range very skilfully, but his performance sometimes seemed almost cavalier, rushing through the runs (what the French call “soaping” them) with fistsful of wrong notes. Not a great showing, though the audience seemed to like it. I'm told Barenboim is impatient about rehearsing and his concerto performances can therefore be “seat-of-the-pants” affairs. Also that he takes too much on for his age. Maybe so.

    The symphony was much better. The Berlin orchestra is wonderfully business-like and forthright (and would have done a great job in Egmont, if only we'd been allowed an overture), and Barenboim's approach, though very carefully crafted, handling Bruckner's tiered build-ups with admirable control and bringing delicate reverence to his “religioso” modulations, is relatively straightforward: more punchy than schmaltzy, not too much fiddle-arsing around with the tempi (mostly moderate to brisk), limited foot-dragging… It was lovely to hear the 6th played with such un-histrionic skill. To pick out a couple of details, it was a great evening for the principal oboe in the second movement, not such a great one for the principal horn, who fluffed quite a lot of notes. Tutti were impressively together, as usual with good German orchestras, and threw up great chunks of sound. But as I mentioned above, it all sounded a little too far off: I remained outside the music, not involved in it, and towards the end found myself thinking of dinner…

    For those wanting more about the acoustics, here's a link to the blog entry.

    Staatskapelle Berlin under Barenboim: Mozart and Bruckner

    $
    0
    0
    La Philharmonie, Paris, Thursday September 8 2016

    Conductor and piano soloist: Daniel Barenboim. Staatskapelle Berlin.
    • Mozart, piano concerto n°26
    • Bruckner, symphony n°6
    I know nothing about acoustics and will only try to describe what I thought I heard from my single seat the other night. But scouting round the web for better-informed opinions about Paris's Philharmonie, I came a cross a blog called From The Sound Up, by an acoustical and architectural designer working in New York, and an article there entitled Why I can’t review the Philharmonie de Paris but why it’s worth trying anyway: a meditation on variability, which gives the impression that the sound in the new hall is especially varied. “Variation in the sound field is the topic of this post,” he writes, “because it is all I could think about after my experience in the brand-new (or, more accurately, yet-to-be-finished) Philharmonie de Paris. During a single concert, I experienced what might have been the worst concert hall acoustics of the tour, followed by what might have been the best.”

    I was in a category 2 seat and found myself on the steeply-raked 5th-floor balcony that faces the orchestra, which a friend calls the "wall of death". For the category (and price: 90 euros) this was surprisingly far from the square, central platform. With reverberation I've seen put variously at 2.3 and 2.6 seconds, the overall sound was, to me, "churchy" (my neighbour said "swimming pool" but I'd say that was an exaggeration; at the end of the concert he claimed they should pull the place down and start again from scratch).

    On account of the distance, it was as if I were sitting somewhere in the nave and the orchestra were playing in front of the altar. The overall sound is warm and roundish and to some extent enveloping, and during quiet passages it's certainly nicely detailed, but when the "high" instruments - the flutes and above all the violins - play loudly, the reverberation kicks in to give a soupy sort of "Mantovani" effect, obscuring the detail. I think this is what some people mean when they say that there is a "halo" around the sound. Lower instruments, cellos and basses especially, fare much, much better.

    The other issue, again at least from where I sat, was that when a score goes abruptly from very loud to very soft, which happens quite often in Bruckner, for the duration of the echo there's confusion, obscuring what follows.

    Overall, I would prefer a drier sound. To my ear, that reverb. too often blurs details, and after an hour or so, because of the excess distance, I started to feel out of things and switch off. One day I will have to go back and sit nearer, to see if the effect is more inclusive – but as I said above, it looks, from what I've read here and there, as if it will be very hard to decide where exactly to buy a seat, the implication being not that sections of the hall are different, but that each individual seat – and even your position sitting in it – is!

    A detail: by one of those odd quirks of acoustics, during the concerto, the sound of the piano hammers was distinctly audible, tap-tap-tapping like a disembodied woodpecker, about three rows in front of me, to the left.

    Bruckner
    The programme was oddly lop-sided: a 25-minute concerto followed by a 20-minute interval, and then the symphony. Why orchestras no longer play overtures baffles me. Will we never hear them again?

    The concerto was Mozart exactly as I no longer want to hear him, by a sleek modern orchestra and on a gleaming piano the size of a ship with plummy sound and a dynamic range Mozart never heard. Barenboim certainly exploited the dynamic range very skilfully, but his performance sometimes seemed almost cavalier, rushing through the runs (what the French call “soaping” them) with fistsful of wrong notes. Not a great showing, though the audience seemed to like it. I'm told Barenboim is impatient about rehearsing and his concerto performances can therefore be “seat-of-the-pants” affairs. Maybe so.

    The symphony was much better. The Berlin orchestra is wonderfully business-like and forthright (and would have done a great job in Egmont, if only we'd been allowed an overture), and Barenboim's approach, though very carefully crafted, handling Bruckner's tiered build-ups with admirable control and bringing delicate reverence to his “religioso” modulations, is relatively straightforward: more punchy than schmaltzy, not too much fiddle-arsing around with the tempi (mostly moderate to brisk), limited foot-dragging… It was lovely to hear the 6th played with such un-histrionic skill. To pick out a couple of details, it was a great evening for the principal oboe in the second movement, not such a great one for the principal horn, who fluffed quite a lot of notes. Tutti were impressively together, as usual with good German orchestras, and threw up great chunks of sound. But as I mentioned above, it all sounded a little too far off: I remained outside the music, not involved in it, and towards the end found myself thinking of dinner…

    For those wanting more about the acoustics, here's a link to the blog entry.

    Verdi - Macbeth

    $
    0
    0
    Palais de la Monnaie, Brussels, Sunday September 25 2016.

    Conductor: Paolo Carignani. Production: Olivier Fredj. Graphics: Jean Lecointre. Sets: Olivier Fredj, Gaspard Pinta, Massimo Troncanetti. Costumes: Frédéric Llinares. Lighting: Christophe Forey. Choreography: Dominique Boivin. Macbeth: Scott Hendricks. Banco: Carlo Colombara. Lady Macbeth: Béatrice Uria-Monzon. Dama di Lady Macbeth: Lies Vandewege. Macduff: Andrew Richards. Malcolm: Julian Hubbard. Medico, Servo, Araldo: Justin Hopkins. Sicario: Gerard Lavalle. La Monnaie Orchestra and Chorus.

    Verdi
    I've often wondered why opera-houses change their productions so often. Anyone in Paris for as long as I've been will have lost count of successive versions of The Magic Flute at the Opéra National, where there have already been three different productions even of Saint-François d'Assise... Just six years ago, La Monnaie offered us Macbeth directed by Warlikowski, surely quite a big name. Yet this season, though the company is supposed to be hard-up, we have a new staging by Olivier Fredj, his first opera. Perhaps it's down to the renovation delays and the limitations of that dreaded tent again. I don't know.

    A read through the programme notes shows Fredj wasn't short of ideas. His "backbone" themes are sleep and dreams, extending these to the Freudian interpretation of dreams, nightmares, surrealism, sleep deprivation and its effects (e.g. hallucinations: Macbeth, in terror, was sleep-deprived, hence Banquo's ghost and the apparitions) and of course sleepwalking. He brought in a surrealist artist as graphic designer to splice together black-and-white pictures to create bizarre hybrids or symmetrical images recalling Rorschach tests. He had gloomy grey videos made of people with sleep disorders writhing or flailing about in narrow hospital beds. He even, if I understood correctly, visited a specialist medical center in Paris to gen up on the latest research into the pathology of sleep, and had a doctor there write an essay on it and its links to Shakespeare's plays.

    But he was also prompted by "All the world's a stage" sometimes to have the chorus sitting in a "mirror" theatre at the rear, facing the audience and sandwiching the action between: merely players. He noted the emphasis on descendants, i.e. babies, represented by prams of the kind you no longer see, except in photos of royal families. And he thinks - again, if I understood correctly, of which there is of course no guarantee whatsoever - that to a modern audience under the influence of cinema, the place for strange things to happen is hotels, and so set the work in one.

    There were, I think, too many strands. At least one, the videos of people in bed, having started the show, never appeared again. Same with the "Rorschach" projections. Overall, the effect was bitty. And if you read the programme, with its nightmares and Freud and surrealism and so on  before seeing the result you might think you were in for a grimly cerebral reading. But it turned out to be an entertaining show, if not necessarily clearly relevant to the play after all.

    It opened, then, with those unfortunate patients churning in their beds and various projections on gauzes. The main, modular, set, was of white walls with mouldings, on which a variety of wallpapers, quilting (that changed cleverly to owls' eyes when the supernatural showed up), pointed motifs representing the dagger or other effects could be projected. As, when we first met them, Macbeth and his wife were running an art deco hotel - the Glamis Castle Country House Hotel and Spa ***** or something like that - there was sometimes a hotel desk to one side, a large double door with stained glass panels at the rear, and lots of sleek, nimble hotel staff in neat black-and-white dashing primly and efficiently about.

    The hotel staff
    But of course, first we had the witches, and here, representing the weird and wonderful supernatural, we got in fact, more or less, the "Time Warp" crowd from the Rocky Horror Picture Show, much cross-dressed, in extravagant black-and-white couture outfits (smarter and richer than Rocky's guests, with an Austin Powers touch: jabots and frilly cuffs for the "men," and Cruella-de-Vil styles for the "girls") and outlandish hair: more fun than frightening. Hotel staff and witches (any borderline between them was blurred) were played by dancers; the chorus sang either in the wings or at the rear or, most effectively, in a marvellous "Patria oppressa" in their street clothes dotted around the tent among the audience - this was probably the best moment all afternoon: it was truly thrilling to be surrounded by the singing, not just sitting facing it.

    Banquo was murdered rather comically with fridge doors, kitchen knives and a frying pan by the "zany"staff in the blue-tiled hotel kitchen, wheeled on in preparation for the banquet. Equally comically, Banquo's ghost was in this case Banquo's head on a platter, revealed by a waiter lifting a large cloche from a dinner trolley. Lady M., who started out - when she was still running the hotel - in wide, plain black trousers with a cigarette holder in her hand, was by now in gleaming gold lamé with a fancy red wig, and Macbeth's grey suit with its plain grey kilt over the trousers was now golden. The kitchen became the scene for the witches' next caperings and the apparitions scene was more like a surreal and ghostly fashion show, with towering, white-faced models wreathed in smoke. As events turned even sourer for him, Macbeth, armed for the battle by the witches/staff with a feather duster and a saucepan lid, like a cousin of Ubu Roi, overturned the prams, presumably (we couldn't actually see) damaging the contents. At the end, the reluctant Malcolm was shoved forward by the chorus (seated at the rear again): neither he, nor the equally reluctant Macbeth earlier, had come to power by their own free will.

    Macbeth and Lady M.
    I think it will be evident by now that I felt there were too many threads not quite weaving coherently together. Not sure, either, that the appearance of Banquo's ghost should have been a gag, or that there was any real reason why the opera should be taking place in a whacky, upscale, art deco Fawlty Towers, (other than that the production team liked art deco), or that we should find Macbeth "entertaining", which might be thought to trivialise it. But entertaining's what it was.

    In any case, whatever the production's faults or however flawed - or worse - the work is said to be, it's one of my favourites, so I was just plain glad to have Macbeth again and not inclined to be picky.

    As I've often said before, this kind of Verdi is exactly the sort of music La Monnaie's orchestra is best at, and Carignani is the kind of brisk, no-messing-about conductor I like. The chorus was splendid, above all when singing their stirring "Patria oppressa" among the audience.

    The men, rather than subtle, were kind of rough-and-ready: "no better than they ought to be," a late Scottish friend of mine might have said. Hendricks and Colombara were both in the same roles in the (darker, by far) Warlikowski production ten years ago. The former's voice has thickened and grown "uglier" - nothing necessarily wrong with that, in this kind of part - and the latter's is stiffer and harder and sort of ungainly. For some reason - something in the timbre, something a bit pinched at the top? - Andrew Richards sounded Welsh to me, but I looked him up and he appears to be American. On Sunday, he seemed to be at his limit but he has impressed the critics.

    I'm not sure what to say about Béatrice Uria-Monzon as Lady Macbeth other than that she made the best of an odd job. People complain that J. Kaufmann's "baritonal" tenor isn't right for all his roles, but as far as I know nobody actually claims he's a baritone, not a tenor at all. BUM, as she's known in France, is undeniably a mezzo, and not of the Shirley Verrett kind. Her dark and round and soft and plummy sound transforms the role: this is a different, possibly disconcerting, Lady Macbeth. She brought it off, but had to keep the top notes short. "Una Macchia" was her best moment.

    I almost feel sorry for the management at La Monnaie, forced by further delays in renovating the Théâtre Royal to change the season's schedule to fit their not-so-temporary plastic hangar on waste ground by the canal. Perhaps it was a sign of gratitude to their much-mucked-about subscribers that I found myself in better seats there this time, closer to the action and with better sound. But as it was often hard to place the singing, I wondered if, to improve the acoustics, they had now installed some subtle amplification. Then, when Malcolm passed close by us with the chorus members asembling for "Patria Oppressa", my neighbour leaned to me and whispered "mike" - he claimed he had seen one by Malcolm's left ear.

    Planes roared overhead, as usual, at strategic moments, and a much slower one, one with propellors, buzzed over seemingly endlessly just after the battle, forcing Macbeth to emote alone on the floor for quite some time before going into his final monologue (the ending chosen for this production). But this Sunday there was something new: a loud rushing sound that I thought might be a wind machine or a side drum roll brought in for atmosphere by the director. But no: it was rain.

    As usual, Maestro Wenarto nails it. But Il giardino di Armida left at the interval!

    Cavalli - Eliogabalo

    $
    0
    0
    ONP Garnier, Paris, Thursday September 29 2016

    Conductor: Leonardo García Alarcón. Production: Thomas Jolly. Choreography: Maud Le Pladec. Eliogabalo: Franco Fagioli. Alessandro Cesare: Paul Groves. Flavia Gemmira: Nadine Sierra. Giuliano Gordio: Valer Sabadus. Anicia Eritea: Elin Rombo. Atilia Macrina: Mariana Flores. Zotico: Matthew Newlin. Lenia: Emiliano Gonzalez Toro. Nerbulone, Tiferne: Scott Conner. Sets: Thibaut Fack. Costumes: Gareth Pugh. Lighting: Antoine Travert. Cappella Mediterranea. Namur Chamber Choir.

    This Eliogabalo at Garnier offers a prime example of how different people's perceptions may be of the same production, as a quick read through the published reviews demonstrates.

    It was Thomas Jolly's first opera. Perhaps those most impressed are too young to find it an unexpected throwback to the 80s, not having lived through the decade. I found (most of) it gloomy, cold and corny. The stage was cavernous black and dominated most of the time by plain black constructions serving various functions, all with steep (black) steps that continued down into the pit. The lighting was chilly and bleak: criss-crossing "pop-concert" beams of white light and, at the rear, a sort of crown or sun of orange squares. The costumes were stiff and plain, in cool , plain colours: grey, blue, violet. The conical stiffness of the guards' outfits made them look like Lego figures (one of the professional critics had, I saw, exactly the same thought). Eliogabalo's were equally stiff and conical, but garnished with large Statue-of-Liberty haloes and lavishy decorated with glittering gold. With his wicked-witch shoes, he looked like a pantomime dame who had hit it rich (or, as a friend e-mailed me: "... like a frumpy bordello madam with pretensions. The wig suggested Hilda Ogden with strassy curlers") and the overall aesthetic brought to mind drag night in a tacky provincial gay club many years ago, with young male dancers, naked apart from white loincloths and short, curly white wigs, striking languidly statuesque poses on the sides.

    I've seen the acting praised; to my eyes, it was limited to teetering precariously up and down the stairs in those awkward shoes and stiff dresses, or striking hammy poses - some camp, some "manly" - on them. Only part three came close, as far as I'm concerned, to a production worthy of a major house like Garnier, with Eliogabalo bathing in spectacular gold in front of a row of square columns and a dimly-lit giant bust (watched over, of course, by those languid, near-naked youths), and at last some action taking place when his severed head finally tumbled down the steps into the orchestra. ELIOGABALO spelled out in blood-spattered capitals on the steps was, however, a final touch of déjà-vu.

    The cast was strong, though the fact that the Bastille is big doesn't make Garnier small and ideally-suited to baroque opera: it is still, on the contrary, large, so even the biggest "baroque" voices may struggle to make proper impact there. In this case, they projected best when there was a set behind to offer support. Franco Fagioli was most impressive in his rich and grainy, expressive middle range, not in virtuoso runs at the top, where his projection dropped considerably. His diction, however, is non-existent, and to my surprise his impact was purely vocal: he projected no perceptible physical personality.

    Not the production - unfortunately
    Nadine Sierra and Elin Rombo made a fine pair, one silvery and silky, the other slightly more creamy and golden, both phrasing nicely. Of the two, Nadine Sierra was audibly more subtle and sophisticated, but had she not been there, Elin Rombo would still have shone. Mariana Flores, however, was relatively raw and crude, probably in part because while singing loudly, she seemed determined at all costs to eschew vibrato.

    Paul Groves (got up to look like some stock bearded biblical figure from The Life Of Brian) also phrased beautifully, as might be expected, but his vocal type sometimes seemed out of place in Cavalli and he occasionally sounded uncomfortable, especially at the top. The character roles of Zotico and Lenia were adequately sung and played (though with no orginality in the corny acting they were given to do) by character tenors. The barely audible (apart from the odd hoot) Valer Sabadus should not be cast in opera at all, let alone in a house the size of Garnier.

    The overall sound of the (large) Capella Mediterranea was dominated by bowed strings. The plucked instruments were seen (long necks bristling like masts in a harbour) but rarely actually heard and use of percussion such as castanets was sparing. The result, to my ear, was monochrome (verging on monotonous), though I thought one published description of Cavalli's score as a "robinet d'eau tiède" (a stream of tepid water) was more amusing than fair. Still, three hours of it, plus two 20-minute intervals, made for a long evening when the production was so unexciting. As we left, the three of us agreed that act three would have done...

    Saint-Saëns - Samson et Dalila

    $
    0
    0
    ONP Bastille, Monday October 24 2016

    Conductor: Philippe Jordan. Production: Damiano Michieletto. Sets: Paolo Fantin. Costumes: Carla Teti. Lighting: Alessandro Carletti. Dalila: Anita Rachvelishvili. Samson: Aleksandrs Antonenko. Le Grand Prêtre de Dagon: Egils Silins. Abimélech: Nicolas Testé. Un vieillard hébreu: Nicolas Cavallier. Un Messager philistin: John Bernard. Premier Philistin: Luca Sannai. Deuxième Philistin: Jian-Hong Zhao. Orchestra and Chorus of the Opéra National de Paris.

    Saint-Saëns
    Just as I was happy to hear Verdi’s Requiem again last week, I was happy to hear Samson et Dalila again this Monday. Saint-Saëns is unfashionable and underrated, but I like him a lot, and wonder not just why I’ve never seen Samson staged before, but why we don’t get at least some of his other operas.

    Musically, it was a rare treat. After what I briefly thought was a rather ponderous, Brahmsian start, bringing to mind the Requiem (Brahms’s, not Verdi’s) and raising initial fears, Philippe Jordan crafted a surprisingly intimate, lovingly shaped and sculpted performance, a model of the clarity and elegance the French see as their peculiar talent. The orchestra was on its best behaviour and the chorus was at its most impressive, as you might expect in this work.

    So the fundamentals were excellent. In addition, our two principals were surely among the best you could hope to hear (though I did read criticism of their “un-French” style - too technical a point for me: I was just happy to have them, true French style or not). Aleksandrs Antonenko has a powerful, dramatic tenor voice. He made up in vocal heft for relatively uncharismatic stage presence in the first two acts. Then, after bringing down the act 2 curtain with a ringing “Trahison!”, in act 3 he acted up a storm, vocally (including some of those howling, Russian-style “wounded bear” sounds) and physically.

    Anita Rachvelishvili is a special case. I don’t know if there’s a name for the phenomenon (perhaps I should call it a gift) that allows some (very few) singers to reach every corner of a large house while singing very softly. Pavarotti could do it. I mentioned above the intimacy of Philippe Jordan’s conducting. Rachvelishvili has a big, richly-timbred voice - a great bronze bell - but astonishingly sang “Printemps qui commence” in the softest, most delicate, tender and intimate way throughout – with even the lowest notes clearly audible and in tune: in other words, conjuring up boudoir-intimacy in the black hole of the Bastille. Later in the evening, of course, she let rip impressively - as well as being dramatically committed. In other words, she was fantastic. My fear now is that the Met (where she was already Carmen to Antonenko’s Don José in 2014; my guess is Samson et D. suits them both better) will sink its claws into her and we’ll never see her here again. Let’s hope she hates flying.

    Not much to say about other cast members, except that it was a shame Nicolas Cavallier wasn't around at the end to take a bow. I'd have clapped loudly.

    The production wasn’t, I thoguht, up to the same standard as the music. Having heard it was updated, I was surprised to hear a colleague who saw it before me say it was “conventional,” but I now see what he meant: the familiar “repressive regime” approach, with extras in black jumpsuits, baseball caps and sunglasses waving machine guns and a dictator (in this case, the High Priest) in a suit with a pistol playing Russian roulette with his captives - Hebrews in drab, dirty, wartime rags.

    The set was basically the same throughout. The sides and rear of the stage were faced with square, slate-grey slabs. A wide, Mies-van-der-Rohe style “aquarium”, with creamy net curtains all round, was raised on piers, with a tunnel beneath, in act 1, so the Philistines could keep an eye on the Hebrews. In act 2, it was on the ground and contained Delila’s bedroom, furnished with sleek, peachy-coloured art-deco armchairs on a powder blue carpet, a bed and an oval, full-length mirror. In act 3 it was raised again, but the furniture had gone bling-bling for the bacchanalia: ornate gilt frames and crimson crushed velvet… and the facing slabs had turned gold.

    The key directorial ideas were plausible enough: Samson so smitten by Delila he cuts his own hair off and hands it to her; Delila so out of sympathy with the Philistines and full of remorse she douses the place and herself with petrol before handing Samson a lighter. In the updated setting, I wondered how the director would deal with the ballets (supposing he didn’t just give up and ask for them to be ditched, as some do). In act 1, devilish, gold painted dancers performed a vision in which Samson foresaw his eyes gouged out. In act 3, as the ballet music struck up, racks of gaudy oriental costumes were bustled in and the High Priest’s guests stepped out of their evening dresses and dinner suits to change for a fancy-dress orgy. This was quite clever. The act 1 devils were back among the guests, drinking from bottles, whipping and spitting on Samson. Throughout the work, Delila had expressed doubt and misgivings at her role. At the end, as I said, she took a jerry-can, doused the place and herself with petrol and handed Samson a lighter. The ensuing explosion was spectacular, with gold plaques popping off the wall (unfortunately but I suppose unintentionally recalling the problems the Bastille has had with its square facing slabs, held back by nets from falling on passers-by) and dazzling yellow lights shining through in our faces.

    As I say, there were some clever ideas. But to me the first two acts, being so like so many productions we see these days, lacked specific “personality” – they could have been from any modern version of almost any opera. And while my companions were quite happy with act 3, I usually find simulated lasciviousness, same-sex groping and jiving to the score ultimately unconvincing. So, “conventional” was about right. To be honest, like the old ladies we chatted to at the interval, I think I might have been quite happy to have a “period” staging for a change.

    Wenarto: a different version of "Printemps qui commence".

    Weill - Die Dreigroschenoper

    $
    0
    0
    Théâtre des Champs Elysées, Paris, Thursday October 27 2016.

    Musical direction: Hans-Jörn Brandenburg, Stefan Rager. Production, sets and lighting: Robert Wilson. Costumes: Jacques Reynaud. Lighting: Andreas Fuchs, Ulrich Eh. J. J. Peachum: Jürgen Holtz. Celia Peachum: Traute Hoess. Polly Peachum: Johanna Griebel. Macheath: Christopher Nell. Tiger Brown: Axel Werner. Lucy Brown: Friederike Nölting. Jenny: Angela Winkler. Filch: Georgios Tsivanoglou. Walter: Luca Schaub. Matthias: Martin Schneider. Jakob: Boris Jacoby. Bob: Winfried Peter Goos. Jimmy: Raphael Dwinger. Ede: Jörg Thieme. Smith: Uli Pleßmann. Kimball: Michael Kinkel. Betty: Anke Engelsmann. Old prostitute: Ursula Höpfner-Tabori. Vixen: Marina Senckel. Dolly: Claudia Burckhardt. Molly: Gabriele Völsch. Messenger: Gerd Kunath. Voice: Walter Schmidinger. Das Dreigroschenoper Orchester.

    Weill
    Bob Wilson is often criticised or mocked for supposedly always doing the same thing: “Pharaohs in profile against a blue background,” as Le Figaro put it recently - for predictable, static, hieratic, monotonous, monochrome productions, though always beautifully lit. Personally, while I do see that some of his work – the Gluck series, perhaps – is plain and, OK, samey, my experience over the years has been of a fair amount of variety. And this criticism neglects what ought to please “Eurotrash” haters, i.e. that Wilson generally tells the story as it is written, often quite entertainingly – his Ring had quite a bit of wide-eyed wit. His sense of humour is rarely mentioned, but in my view it’s in works involving fun, or at least wry humour, that Wilson is at his liveliest best: Les Fables de La Fontaine or L’incoronazione di Poppea, for example, and now (now for me, that is: the production dates back to 2007) Die Dreigroschenoper.

    As far as I’m concerned, this was a near perfect production of the kind it's a rare privilege to witness and a work of undeniable genius, successfully blending Weimar and Neue Sachlichkeit, Punch and Judy, silent film, The Addams Family, cartoons and Nô (and no doubt other influences I was too ignorant to pick up) into a single, coherent and absolutely convincing universe, with a gallery or parade of amiable reprobates at once caricatures yet real, or even more than plain real: larger than life.

    Brecht
    Do his actors have striking features or is it the extravagant makeup, or is it a bit of both? Each has his or her own gestures and mannerisms and these are, as usual when Bob Wilson is on form, practised to a tee and meaningful right down to the last glance, tic or curl of the lip. You wonder, as you marvel at the result, how the cast manage it. The result is to create powerful, distinct individual characters, even among the supporting roles, that remain branded into your mind’s eye days after the show.

    Among the most memorably charismatic: Jürgen Holz (now 84) as an authoritative Peachum; the charming, vague but smiling Jenny of Angela Winkler (famous, I learnt from a review, for her work with director Schlöndorff in the 70s); Johanna Griebel's bright, blinking, Betty-Boop Polly; the truly extraordinary Axel Werner as a giant, sardonic Tiger Brown; and most charismatic of all – against all odds you might say, in blond Marcel waves and orange lipstick - Christopher Nell, au unexpectedly young, slender, slinky, ambiguous but totally seductive Macheath.

    The staging was largely black on black: impeccable, mostly black, Weimar-era costumes, some white dresses, black, white and grey make-up, a few props deftly handled, and, as usual, superb lighting: grids of white Dan Flavin tubes, circles of orange dots, pale, shimmering, subtly shaded backdrops with extras dashing across in silhouette. The brothel scene, with its assorted whores, all ages, shapes and sizes, Macheath, dressed up to the nines in black velvet and smoking a large (real) cigar, a few industrial light fittings hanging down and a few red bars across the floor, was especially magnificent.

    The musical style was pure Berliner Ensemble, though "pure" may not be the right word for such rowdy, raucous, sometimes wonderfully ropey singing and playing. This was a great, great show and I don't feel I can do it justice. The best thing I've seen, in fact, since Einstein on the Beach– and that was Wilson as well!

    A snippet from Maestro Wenarto.

    St Petersburg Phil - Rachmaninoff and Stravinsky

    $
    0
    0
    Théâtre des Champs Elysées, Paris, Wednesday November 9 2016

    Conductor: Yuri Temirkanov. Piano: Boris Berezovsky. Saint Petersburg Philharmonic Orchestra. 
    • Rachmaninoff: Concerto for piano No. 3 op. 30.
    • Stravinsky:  The Rite of Spring
    I like Yuri Temirkanov very much. His conducting is precise and matter-of-fact and undemonstrative, his gestures, when he makes any at all, are restrained and however agitated the score may get there’s no mad arm-waving or wild writhing around on the podium. His face gives little away.

    The sound he cultivates is relatively dry and restrained as well: no lush wallowing, some quite daring tempi, and, though his orchestra could, if asked to, play extremely loud, no absolute extremes of loudness, even in a piece like Le Sacre. He comes across as having almost a kind of scientific detachment, as if conducting constructivist ballets, seemingly giving equal weight to all parts. As a result, you hear inner harmonies and details you never heard before. The words that came to my mind during the piece were “post-modern." I wonder if that makes any sense. Well, it was a detailed, fascinating performance: a learning experience.

    I like Boris Berezovsky very much as well. Though Rachmaninoff is a long way from Haydn, as far as is plausible the concerto playing was classical and chamber-like: again, restrained. The pianist was constantly turning to look at or leaning back to listen carefully to the strings around him, as well, of course, as keeping up often smiling eye contact with the conductor. His virtuosity was phenomenal: dazzling ripples of the quietest legato runs at hair-raising speed, for example*. The applause was long and loud.

    No absolute extremes of loudness, as I said; softness, on the other hand... The encore was a beautifully loving, tender performance of the prelude to The Legend Of The Invisible City Of Kitezh And The Maiden Fevroniya (which must surely be one of the longest opera titles ever). I'd been wondering what that harp was doing at the back of the stage...

    *When I described this to a friend he replied: "I call it high-speed caressing."

    [This concert was recorded by France Musique. It will be well worth looking out for]

    Strauss - Salome

    $
    0
    0
    Kungliga Operan (Royal Swedish Opera), Stockholm, Friday November 11 2016

    Conductor: Lawrence Renes. Production: Sofia Jupither. Sets: Lars-Åke Thessman. Costumes: Maria Geber. Lighting: Linus Fellbom. Herod: Michael Weinius. Herodias: Katarina Dalayman. Salome: Erika Sunnegårdh. Jochanaan: Josef Wagner. Narraboth: Jonas Degerfeldt. Herodias’s Page: Karin Osbeck. First Jew: Klas Hedlund. Second Jew: Anders Blom. Third Jew: Pierre Gylbert. Fourth Jew: Nils Hübinette. Fifth Jew: Erik Rosenius. First Nazarene: Joris Grouwels. Second Nazarene: Martin Hedström. First Soldier: Mattias Milder. Second Soldier: Lennart Forsén. Cappadocian: Ian Power. Slave: Anna Danielsson. Kungliga Hovkapellet (Royal Swedish Orchestra).

    Strauss
    A good night out in Stockholm with this very sound Salome and an excellent dinner in the same building after, which is more than you can hope for in Paris.

    Sweden’s Royal Opera, as well as having a good orchestra, as you might expect, fielded a very strong cast of principals, including – unusually, I feel like saying – a Herod and a Herodias who actually sang their parts, rather than barking them (I’m not saying I’ve never heard exciting barking: it can be very effective, dramatically speaking, in the right roles). Katarina Dalayman was a charismatic Herodias, even when just standing around in a glittering caftan, observing the action. Michael Weinius is an outstanding tenor, quite young for Herod (by the standards we get used to) and very musical. Josef Wagner was a truly thrilling Jochanaan, very nearly stealing the show. And though there was tough competition for charisma from Katarina Dalayman, and the production asked her to act maybe a bit too young and innocent and pigeon-toed, Erika Sunnegårdh was a sterling Salome, hitting all the notes with impressive apparent ease. (It surely can’t be actual. But I’ve heard that singing teachers in Sweden tell their pupils to hide the effort, rather than telegraph it with tortured expressions and writhing limbs. No names.)

    Herod’s palace was a Mies-like glass box, something like his Barcelona pavilion and thus also something like the glass box in Paris’s new Samson et Dalila, only in this case set at an angle at the rear, with stepped terraces down to the apron and, on the left, two hatches down to cisterns among the rocks. The box was not, however, furnished with trim Barcelona chairs and stools, but with gold-framed old-master paintings and elaborate, expensive antique mirrors as big as the walls, and fabulously nouveau-riche brocade fabrics and cushions, Versace-style (perhaps actual Versace). It reminded me of a furniture shop near the bastille called Roméo that sold stuff so amazingly flashy you wondered just who might fork out a fortune for it. (I just checked: it has moved to make way for sports shoes, but the brand still exists at other addresses.) A large, crustily-cratered disc of a moon was let down slowly at the back.

    Roméo
    Herodias had, as I said, a glittery caftan, Salome a silver lame dress, Herod was in plum silk pyjamas and a velvet smoking jacket and his house guests, the Jews and Nazarenes, looking like Russian or Balkan mafiosi with open-necked shirts and chisel-toed shoes turning up at the point, were supplemented by one or two scantily-clad trophy girls. The guards wore black suits.

    Apart from the modern dress, the directing followed the instructions on the box, with a few exceptions. To me there were two noticeable weaknesses. First, people who had nothing to do really did nothing. Even when Narraboth committed hara-kiri the guards didn’t budge – nobody tried to stop him. Similarly, Herod and Herodias hung around motionless during Salome’s final scene and might have done better to slink off off, leaving her alone until the end.

    Second, Salome might better have just danced. Instead, she was humiliated, with hints of sado-masochism, by Herod’s guests, at his invitation. This was more embarrassing than effective. The other exception was, though, a strength. Jochanaan had his throat well and truly slit, but his head was not sliced off. He was carried, bloodied and near-naked, out of the cistern and Salome was able to kiss his mouth while caressing his whole, gory body. This was a lot more effective than the usual, faintly comical plastic head that distracts us during the famous finale.

    It was a pleasure as always to discover a new house – new to me I mean: this one, with a very fancy "Gold Foyer" upstairs, was built in the 1890s in place of a Gustavian building of the 1780s, a demolition some Swedes have never quite got over. If Stockholm’s opera-goers are used to these standards at a third of the current Paris price, they are lucky indeed.

    Here, Maestro Wenarto shows how the dance should be done.

    Chamber Concert, Allhelgonakyrkan, Stockholm

    $
    0
    0
    Allhelgonakyrkan, Stockholm, Saturday 12 November 2016

    Bengt Forsberg: piano. Ann Hallenberg: mezzo-soprano. Mina Fred: viola.
    • Bengt Forsberg, Mina Fred: Improvisation for viola and piano.
    • Max Reger: Suite Number Two in G minor for solo viola, op 131d: Andante
    • Sten Broman: Fantasy, Fugue and Chorale for viola and piano
    • Clara Schumann: four songs
    • Johannes Brahms: two songs for alto, viola and piano, op.91
    • Robert Fuchs: viola sonata
    • Encore - Johannes Brahms: Wiegenlied
    An interesting, eclectic programme for this rather sparsely-attended chamber concert in the wooden Allhelgonakyrkan church in Stockholm, where record snowfalls for the time of year made getting around quite tricky and probably kept some regulars away.

    The evening opened surprisingly with a totally contemporary – intrinsically, since it was done on-the-spot – improvisation by the excellent Bengt Forsberg, well known to many as Anne-Sophie Von Otter’s usual accompanist, and Mina Fred on the viola, starting with the former rooting around inside the piano, plucking at the strings while scratchy viola harmonics emerged from the back of the church, yet ending almost like a Spanish dance.

    This ran without a break into the Max Reger solo, reminiscent of a folk ballad. To a British ear, Sten Broman’s Fantasia, a conservative work for its date (1963) but unmistakably well-crafted, brought to mind Vaughan Williams on a good day. The decidedly Brahmsian viola sonata (1899) of the Austrian Robert Fuchs, whom I see Brahms admired, is a strong, sometimes passionate work. Both surely deserve more frequent outings.

    But what had given me the idea of visiting Stockholm for the first time was the chance to hear Ann Hallenberg, not in flamboyant baroque arias, but in four Clara Schumann Lieder and Brahms’ two songs for alto and viola. Anyone who knows her voice, or possibly has heard her recording of the Alto Rhapsody, will understand my motivation and have a fair idea of what I heard: the warmth, the sumptuous timbre, the sensitively varied dynamics, the perfectly-judged sentiments, the right balance, in the concert context, between reading and acting… With Ann Hallenberg, the usual, you might say, to keep it short.

    Strauss - Capriccio

    $
    0
    0
    Palais de la Monnaie, Brussels, Sunday November 13 2016.

    Conductor: Lothar Koenigs. Production: David Marton. Sets and costumes: Christian Friedländer. Costumes: Pola Kardum. Lighting: Henning Streck. Die Gräfin: Sally Matthews. Der Graf, ihr Bruder: Dietrich Henschel. Flamand, ein Musiker: Edgaras Montvidas. Olivier, ein Dichter: Lauri Vasar. La Roche, der Theaterdirektor: Kristinn Sigmundsson. Die Schauspielerin Clairon : Charlotte Hellekant. Monsieur Taupe: François Piolino. Eine italienische Sängerin: Elena Galitskaya. Ein italienischer Tenor: Dmitry Ivanchey. Der Haushofmeister: Christian Oldenburg. Diener: Zeno Popescu, Nabil Suliman, Vincent Lesage, Bertrand Duby, Kris Belligh, Pierre Derhet, Maxime Melnik, Artur Rozek. Eine junge Tänzerin: Florence Bas, Margot-Annah Charlier, Germaine François. 

    From "Wie schön ist die Prinzessin Salome" in Sweden to "Bezaubernd ist sie heute wieder!" in Belgium in one weekend... Fortified with a choucroûte royale à l’alsacienne at the Taverne du Passage, off we trudged across the damp waste ground, past the ruined warehouses and a tattooing fair, to La Monnaie’s temporary big top for that least spectacular, least circus-like of operas, Capriccio.

    The house orchestra was only occasionally stretched by Strauss’s de luxe virtuoso demands and, like Sweden’s Royal Opera for Salome, La Monnaie put together an excellent cast, so musically we had a very good afternoon – with one “disclaimer”: I still think that, to improve the acoustics of their ill-starred tent, they have installed subtle amplification. At times you can’t tell who’s singing, as the disembodied sound doesn’t come from anywhere in particular; at others, you can, which may imply that the excellent balance between different singers was achieved artificially by amplifying each one differently. In any case, I see a little pink bud over each singer’s right ear, but I suppose I could be imagining things…

    Edgaras Montvidas and Lauri Vasar were welcome discoveries, both "all perfect in their parts" (as the ladies say to a castrato in Signor Velluti and the Female Choristers, a saucy old print), dramatically and vocally, Montvidas especially. Kristinn Sigmundsson was on remarkable form, considering the years he’s already given us pleasure, and in excellent voice. Charlotte Hellekant played a more restrained, less “actress” Clairon than some, with strong, upright presence. Dietrich Henschel was Dietrich Henschel: elegant as always and more natural an actor than ever, even close up on the video screens that flanked the stage.

    I don’t know if Sally Matthews was directed to overdo the countess’s primness or just overdid it herself, and her singing style (I’ve seen her before and think this is her own) remains relatively cool and disengaged – or “detached”, as a friend who’s also seen and heard her put it – but her voice itself is fabulous: not a hint of particular effort, strong and straight, rich in timbre, Goldilocks vibrato… It must have been at least as maddening for her as it was for us that no fewer than four jets came in to land at Zavenetem during her final scene, enabling us to gauge quite accurately the frequency of arrivals on a Sunday evening.

    David Marton’s production was set in a slightly shabby theatre – one privately owned by the countess, perhaps - presented in cross-section so we could see under the stage on the left, boxes facing us, and rows of seats rising to the right. From where I was sitting, towards the end of a row also on the right, I couldn’t, therefore, see the whole of this on-stage auditorium. I don’t know if that’s why there were live videos on either side, of if they were meant to allow us to admire the admirably detailed acting and expressions. It made sense enough for the characters to be discussing the relative merits of poetry, music, dance and directing while wandering about that theatrical setting, with a sofa and some chairs on stage, but less to transform the stage, in the second half (La Monnaie inserted a break) into the countess’s saloon with a forest of potted plants carried on by the servants – who sang very musically, by the way.

    I liked the hints at the countess entertaining a Lady-Chatterly-style relationship with her handsome, brooding, fair-haired butler, all brass-buttoned up in black, implying that at the end her choice would be between three suitors, not just two. I quite hoped she’d fall into his arms, making a novel early decision, at the curtain, but she didn’t. On the contrary, she seemed to give him the brush-off.

    Some people liked the introduction of three dancers: one a child in a tutu, one a grown woman, one old and grey, representing, I suppose, the three ages of Madeleine whom she confronted, instead of her mirror, while the jets roared over in the finale. There was some potential in this, harking back to the Marschällin’s nocturnal soliloquy and raising briefly in my mind the notion that she might be realising it was time, as time passed, to stop being silly, give up her manservant and settle down seriously with someone of her own class.

    But overall I found these three a bit confusing, and was more confused still when at one point the butler seemed to be venting his anger semi-sadistically on the child ballerina, practising under the stage, or at another when dancers and Italian singers were marched off, wearing raincoats, in file. The costumes were contemporary with the work: wartime, so perhaps this, and Monsieur Taupe, pottering round quite often and measuring people up with calipers or compasses, were a vague reference to Nazi eugenics and the camps, as my neighbor surmised. In Paris, Carson slipped in one Gestapo uniform (an officer accompanying Clairon) and a little swastika; there was none of that here.

    At least one critic wrote that these ideas were sparks of genius. At least one other was a bit baffled, like me. I’d have been quite happy with just the theatre setting – no need to bring in all those potted palms to make a room on stage where no real room would be – and the hint at a daring affair with the handsome butler. But in any case, leaving aside the jetliners landing, thanks especially to the singers, this was a strong Capriccio that would make a nice addition to the DVD library, if filmed.

    A different italienischer Tenor: Maestro Wenarto.

    42nd Street

    $
    0
    0
    Théâtre du Châtelet, Paris, Saturday November 26 2016

    Conductor: Gareth Valentine. Production and choreography: Stephen Mear. Sets and costumes: Peter McKintosh. Lighting: Chris Davey. Julian Marsh: Alexander Hanson. Dorothy Brock: Ria Jones. Peggy Sawyer: Monique Young. Billy Lawlor: Dan Burton. Maggie Jones: Jennie Dale. Bert Barry: Carl Sanderson. Ann Reilly: Emma Kate Nelson. Andy Lee: Stephane Anelli. Pat Denning: Matthew McKenna. Abner Dillon: Teddy Kempner. Phyllis Dale: Chantel Bellew. Lorraine Flemming: Charlie Allen. Diane Lorimer: Emily Goodenough. Ethel: Jessica Keable. Oscar: Barnaby Thompson. Mac, Doctor, Thug 1: Scott Emerson. Châtelet Orchestra.

    Ruby Keeler in 1933
    The Châtelet’s “Christmas” show and director Jean-Luc Choplin’s parting shot before he quits the job and the house shuts for renovation, is 42nd Street. For those who don’t know it, 42nd Street is an unashamedly escapist patchwork of numbers from various depression-era film musicals involving choreographer Busby Berkeley. The thinnest of backstage plots serves as the pretext for a series of lavish song-and-dance set pieces. Wikipedia’s article quotes theatre historian John Kenrick as writing: "When the curtain slowly rose to reveal forty pairs of tap-dancing feet, the star-studded opening night audience at the Winter Garden cheered... Champion” (i.e. Gower Champion, director of the 1980 Broadway production, who died on the day of the opening) “followed this number with a series of tap-infused extravaganzas larger and more polished than anything Broadway really had in the 1930s." So it might almost be seen as a demonstration piece – a virtuoso showbiz showcase.

    Broadway professionalism doesn’t always make it across the Atlantic to France. In this case, it only had to make it across the Channel, as nearly everyone involved was from the UK, affirming that London’s reputation for the staging of musicals is fully deserved. I had no idea: the last time I went to a musical in London was in the 70s. It was A Chorus Line and I hated it. 42nd Street is a different kettle of fish (no droopy, self-obsessed, whining, whinging monologues – mostly just corny wisecracks and the-show-must-go-on clichés) and I loved it. The professionalism of this new staging is phenomenal through number after number of fast, precision-engineered dances with plenty of references back to the 30s but in a slicker, fleeter contemporary style. “A welcome contrast with so much ineptness on the opera stage,” wrote a friend a day or two later. I’ve often had the same thought in New York, comparing musicals with the Met.

    The highly-coloured production (lots of red, green and purple) keeps the applause-seeking forty pairs of tap-dancing feet at the start, and nods, at the end, to the finale of the 1933 film with a spectacular tunnel arch of skyscrapers pointing down to the stage, with parts outlined in red lights. The basic set is an all-purpose arrangement of red-painted gantries with the brick backstage wall at the rear. These convert smoothly and seamlessly into the various spaces needed: a night club and its tiers of booths, a railway station with benches, etc. Props or sets-within sets, such as the star-of-the-show’s wallpapered dressing-room or the Buffalo-bound sleeping car, are wheeled efficiently on and off, or art-deco light fittings are lowered and raised.

    The superb costumes, make-up and marcelled wigs are in period (i.e. around 1933) and the Berkeley-inspired set pieces do nothing to avoid Kitsch – e.g. giant flowers bobbing around on heads or an outlandishly extravagant, all-white fashion parade. The lighting is often nostalgically golden.

    The cast was all smiles and cheeky charm, looking as if every minute of frenzied hoofing while singing - presumably gruelling, especially on Saturday evening after a matinee - was huge fun and an absolute doddle. It’s impossible to single out individual principals for praise as they were all so damned good. This was just a great evening out and an escape from grim everyday reality (Trump as president-elect, French elections gearing up, Christmas looming only four weeks away…) that sent people home humming and with a smile on their faces.

    Many of the best things I saw in the 90s and “noughties” (Die Frau, Vixen, Les Paladins, Belle Hélène, Grande Duchesse…) were at the Châtelet. Then, when Choplin decided the programming should be more “eclectic,” I stopped subscribing and only bought specific shows, like this one. I wonder what sort of programming will be on offer when the theatre opens again, with a new director, in 2019…

    Mascagni - Cavalleria Rusticana / Hindemith - Sancta Susanna

    $
    0
    0
    ONP Bastille, Wednesday November 30 2016

    Conductor: Carlo Rizzi. Production: Mario Martone. Sets: Sergio Tramonti. Costumes: Ursula Patzak. Lighting: Pasquale Mari. Santuzza: Elīna Garanča. Turiddu: Yonghoon Lee. Lucia: Elena Zaremba. Alfio: Vitaliy Bilyy. Lola: Antoinette Dennefeld. Susanna: Anna Caterina Antonacci. Klementia: Renée Morloc. Alte Nonne: Sylvie Brunet-Grupposo. Orchestra and Chorus of the Opéra National de Paris.

    Puzzled by the apparently odd pairing of Cavalleria Rusticana and Sancta Susanna, I went to the Bastille last night unsure of what to expect. The link between the two turned out to be basically the relationship between religion and sex, obvious in Sancta Susanna and made more obvious in Cavalleria Rusticana by heightening both. The crucifix, in various sizes, was a recurrent image. Director Mario Martone added in interview that both libretti refer to the heady scent of flowers, which seemed to be a bit “tiré par les cheveux”. He admitted he wasn’t keen on the “rhetoric” of so-called verismo, so in Cav he went for sobriety: no backdrops, indeed no scenery to speak of on a black stage, mostly dimly lit, and dark 19th-century costumes.

    Mascagni
    The staging was “sexed-up” by having a small, grimy brothel, complete with Madame, staff and patrons, glide across the empty stage at the beginning, and “religioned-up” by setting the action up to the intermezzo against the Easter mass, here not hidden in the church but occupying the dark stage. The chorus brought their own chairs and placed them in two blocks, separated by an aisle, facing the audience. When an altar appeared at the rear, a giant crucifix came down over it, a (pretend) lamb was sacrificed and a second, processional crucifix appeared to the left. As the priest and altar-boys filed in, candles lit and censers swinging, they (the chorus) turned their backs on us for mass, which went on silently - sermon, collection, communion and all - while the more usual business progressed on the apron (fortunately for the singers’ projection). After mass, the same chairs were set in a circle to form the village square. It was as simple as that and perfectly effective: “We don’t really need the village,” as my neighbour said.

    Musically it sounded to me as if Carlo Rizzi was also trying to tone down the verismo rhetoric in a plain, no-nonsense performance. I can understand this, but am not sure it works: perhaps with Mascagni the only real solution is to let the bodice rip. The cast, however, was excellent. Elena Zaremba didn’t have much to do, of course, but she did it with great, straight-backed dignity and charisma. Antoinette Dennefeld was agreeably fresh-voiced and fluid. Yonghoon Lee has, as a friend also there put it later, “lots of metal” in his voice and is generous with it. Over-generous? I wonder how long he will be able to give so much in roles of this kind. Elīna Garanča, whom I hadn’t seen for years and years (as Sextus in La Clemenza di Tito in 2007, to be exact) was just marvellous. Gorgeous timbre. “In sumptuous voice,” said the friend.

    Though there was a curtain and a pause for a change of scenery, the house stayed dark and there was no interval.

    Hindemith
    Sancta Susanna is a short story about mad nuns with a sexual crush on the crucified Christ. The plot is on Wikipedia. The curtain rose on a wall of cracked rock, filling the whole space, and Susanna’s cell, a hole in the wall, with a bed and a chair, a little crucifix and a little window. As the tale of Sister Beata was told, the bottom of the rock fell to reveal what was probably the giant Easter-mass crucifix, now lying abandoned underfloor and a long-haired, naked dancer acting the tale out. As the story progressed to its climax, Susanna stripped off her veils (revealing short, chopped hair) and habit (revealing her naked breasts in stark white light), an incredible giant spider, operated by slithering dancers in black, crept forward on the right with another nude dancer on its back, and the foot of a, this time, colossal crucifix, appeared at the rear – so colossal, the foot (well, up to the knees) was all there was room for. Finally, Susanna was walled in as the rock rose to fill the space again.

    Carlo Rizzi and the orchestra seemed to me to show more interest in Hindemith’s more interesting score (a brief beauty: "In this case I would have arrived at the interval..." commented a musical friend on Facebook). Renée Morloc and Sylvie Brunet-Grupposo, with her deep, dark, grainy voice, were excellent, and Anna Caterina Antonacci was on stunning form, vocally and physically: “Superb,” the friend said. “When she sang ‘I am beautiful’ she really was!” Said my neighbour over steak and chips afterwards.

    It turned out, then, to be a very strong double bill, dramatically and vocally. This was the première, yet there was no booing. And it’s very satisfactory to have two successful performances in a single evening, one of them a discovery, over early enough to start dinner before ten and be in bed by midnight.

    Maestro Wenarto hasn't published any of Sancta Susanna yet, so here's some Mascagni instead.

    Gluck - Iphigénie en Tauride

    $
    0
    0
    ONP Garnier, Monday December 19 2016

    Conductor: Bertrand de Billy. Production: Krzysztof Warlikowski. Sets and Costumes: Malgorzata Szczesniak. Lighting: Felice Ross. Video: Denis Guéguin. Choreography: Claude Bardouil. Iphigénie: Véronique Gens. Oreste: Étienne Dupuis. Pylade: Stanislas de Barbeyrac. Thoas: Thomas Johannes Mayer. Diane, Première Prêtresse: Adriana Gonzalez. Deuxième Prêtresse, une Femme Grecque: Emanuela Pascu. Un Scythe, un Ministre: Tomasz Kumiega. Iphigénie (silent role): Renate Jett. Orchestra and Chorus of the Opéra National de Paris.

    Iphigénie en Tauride was Krzysztof Warlikowski’s first production for the Opéra de Paris, 10 years ago, and was violently booed at the time, but I had never seen it yet. Since then, thanks to the likes of his Makropoulos Case, King Roger or even Parsifal, which he made palatable in the same way some people claim they have ways to make brussels sprouts edible, I’ve become a fan of his, so I was glad to have this chance to discover the missing link – which has now, ainsi va le monde, become something of a Paris Opera classic.

    Warlikowski sets the work in a retirement home for very grand old ladies. From that point on, most of the action is flash-backs or going on in the elderly Iphigénie’s mind. This opens up opportunities for what have become Warlikowski-trademark layers of action involving the same characters at different times of life, alongside intriguing details that raise questions rather than presenting ideas or concrete events. An example of the latter would be the projection, in large letters, of Gluck’s dedication of the piece to Marie-Antoinette: should we start seeking parallels between her and Iphigénie? This is the kind of thought-provoking stuff I’ve come to like with Warlikowski: he draws you in and sets you wondering, so you’re an active, not just a passive, spectator.

    At the start, there’s no curtain, but a transparent screen reflecting Garnier back at us, and an upper-class family grouped, immobile, at the rear of the stage, visible because brightly lit. When the screen rises, behind it we discover a large space – the old people’s home – with green-tiled side walls. On the left a line of showers, on the right, a line of washbasins, above, rows of ceiling fans that will frequently cast their moving shadows on the action below, and at the rear, industrial steel doors with graffiti on. In the far right corner, some club armchairs and a TV set. From photos I’ve seen, the director must have simplified what goes on in this space. In the past, there must have been more extras milling around in ordinary clothes. In the present version, the focus is on the characters and their doubles at various ages and in various garbs (e.g. the young, naked Orestes first loving his mother, then killing her). At the start, the old ladies are walking up and down purposefully in their night clothes. By the interval they’re in formal black, demurely eating cake with forks on a row of chairs on the apron (and as you file out for a drink, you have the unsettling realization that the audience is full of creaking dodderers too, yourself included; is that why the house is reflected back?). By the end, when an apparently royal family lines up in mourning on the left, they’re in black coats complete with medals.

    Iphigénie appears first as an even grander old lady than the others, in a gold dress and big, blond hair. Later, the gold dress and big, blond wig are worn by a silent double, as the singing Iphigénie, in red, then in black, grows younger. Thoas makes his first appearance in a wheelchair and his last, having strewn long-stemmed red roses on the stage, slumped with his throat cut by Pylade, in dress uniform, over the edge of a box to the right of the stage. The old, gold-dressed Iphigénie is dead on the floor, under the washbasins.

    We had three excellent principals. Étienne Dupuis is a very promising young baritone, and Stanislas de Barbeyrac is a rising star who at present can do no wrong. They could, though, have sung with more dynamic subtlety, their tendency being to belt it out. But that may have been to compensate for the absence of reflective sets, something Véronique Gens, in superb voice, suffered from to some extent, when the orchestra was loud. Thomas Johannes Mayer was presumably miscast: I’ve read he’s a good Wotan, but last night, to his apparent amusement, he was booed. The secondary roles were also very well taken, though Tomasz Kumiega’s French pronunciation was a bit odd.

    The orchestra, however, (the Paris Opera orchestra, so using modern instruments) seemed poorly focused, the chorus, singing from the back of the pit, was somewhat disembodied, and Bertrand de Billy’s conducting was rather featureless to me: plain, vanilla…

    Still, it was good to see the production, better still to be reminded what a perfectly-crafted, neoclassical “objet d’art” a Gluck opera is, and with such a strong cast of soloists, we had a good evening of it – “une bonne soirée,” as my neighbour commented, pulling on his coat at the end.

    Greetings

    Jansons conducts Bruckner's 5th symphony

    $
    0
    0
    Théâtre des Champs Elysées, Paris, Saturday January 28 2017

    Conductor: Mariss Jansons. The Philharmonia Orchestra.

    • Bruckner: Symphony N°5

    Bruckner
    My job takes me to all manner of industrial plants, and I well remember, in a German distillery, coming across the most beautiful machine I have ever seen: a complex, automated assembly of stainless steel and orange gloss, kept in splendid, pristine isolation in a glassed-in room. No photos were allowed, the process being a trade secret, and to my disappointment, not even on omniscient Google could I find a souvenir picture of this magnificent precision object.

    I was reminded of this memorable piece of modern engineering on Saturday night, as Mariss Jansons conducted the Philharmonia in Bruckner’s 5th, in which every detail was perfectly honed and calibrated. Jansons’ conducting gives the impression he has studied the score intensely, given every bar thought, and taken decisions at every step; and that on the night he is wholly – intensely indeed - devoted to helping the orchestra present those decisions with clarity and mastery. He looks totally involved in what he’s doing.

    I was asked, before the concert, if I’d report back “on lines within the different parts, between them and on coherence and colors.” What can I say? To me this was perfection, absolutely Bruckner as I like him best. The degree of clarity and precision achieved was outstanding and the effects needed – e.g. the extraordinary dynamic range, totally under control - must only be possible with a team of musicians as professional as the Philharmonia at the peak of its form. Internal lines were clearly legible (you could take music dictation from this performance, like Mozart writing down the Vatican’s Miserere, though in this case you’d need as many arms as a Hindu deity to do it) and Jansons paid evident attention to the crafting of handovers from, say, violins to violins or flutes to trumpets, or to mirrored lines. The transition from the Salvation-Army brass chorales in the last movement to the hushed strings had something miraculous about it, and the sheer excellence of the playing in the second movement almost brought tears of gratitude to my eyes.

    What he did not do, I’m glad to say, was to try to smooth out Bruckner’s blocky-ness, or I might say the weirdness that first intrigued me in Bruckner as a teenager. The sections remained distinct, the oddness of, e.g. those isolated clarinet octaves, was left intact. Yet with no loss of coherence: what really impressed me was the sense of inevitably, or everything being, as Radiohead might have put it, in its right place, and consistent in tone – in this case, warm, woody sound from the Philharmonia, plus of course rock-solid brass. This was not plush, velvety, romantic Bruckner, but modern Bruckner, looking forward. To mix my machine metaphor with another one for a moment, I had the admittedly slightly daft thought that it was as if, at the time of Winterhalter portraits, Bruckner was already inventing Cubism.

    But back to the distillery. This performance was a big, precision machine in four main blocks all coupled together and running smoothly. It was the finest, most thrilling, most satisfying concert I’ve been to in a very long time and certainly one of the best I’ve ever witnessed. A chap in Scotland once told me Jansons was the bee’s knees. Well, if he’s always as good as this, I’m now a fan and will be looking out for his Paris appearances in the future – especially if Buckner’s other symphonies are in the works.
    Viewing all 355 articles
    Browse latest View live